Squaw Lake(Dan Maddox)
Key Takeaway
Squaw Lake(Dan Maddox) is classified as significant hazard in Tennessee. It was completed in 1963 and is 63 years old. Significant hazard means failure could cause economic or environmental damage. Learn more.
Physical Details
| Dam Length | 565 ft |
| Dam Type | Earth |
| Max Storage | 1.5K acre-ft |
| Normal Storage | 862 acre-ft |
| Surface Area | 56 acres |
| Drainage Area | 3 sq mi |
| Year Completed | 1963 (63 years old) |
| NID ID | TN10104 |
Safety Information
No probable loss of human life, but can cause economic loss, environmental damage, or disruption of lifeline facilities.
Hazard potential describes downstream consequences of failure, not the dam's current condition. What does this mean?
Ownership
VEST, RUSTY
Private
Nearby Dams
Chief Creek
Lewis, TN
Significant HazardNapier Diversion
Lewis, TN
Significant HazardJackson
Lewis, TN
Low HazardNapier
Lewis, TN
Low HazardVfw Lake
Lawrence, TN
Low HazardLaurel Hill Lake
Lawrence, TN
Significant HazardMiller
Lawrence, TN
Significant HazardPine Lake #2
Lawrence, TN
Significant HazardFrequently Asked Questions
What is the hazard classification of Squaw Lake(Dan Maddox)?
Squaw Lake(Dan Maddox) is classified as Significant Hazard. No probable loss of human life, but can cause economic loss, environmental damage, or disruption of lifeline facilities. This classification refers to the potential downstream consequences of a failure, not the dam's current structural condition.
Who owns and operates Squaw Lake(Dan Maddox)?
Squaw Lake(Dan Maddox) is owned by VEST, RUSTY (Private). The owner is responsible for maintenance, inspections, and compliance with dam safety regulations.
When was Squaw Lake(Dan Maddox) built?
Squaw Lake(Dan Maddox) was completed in 1963, making it 63 years old. Many U.S. dams were built between the 1930s and 1970s during a period of major infrastructure investment.
When was Squaw Lake(Dan Maddox) last inspected?
Squaw Lake(Dan Maddox) was last inspected on October 9, 2018. Inspection dates indicate when a formal review occurred, not the results of that inspection.