Cub Creek #1
Key Takeaway
Cub Creek #1 is classified as low hazard in Tennessee. It was completed in 1965 and is 61 years old. Its primary use is flood risk reduction.
Physical Details
| Dam Length | 2,220 ft |
| Dam Type | Earth |
| Max Storage | 1.0K acre-ft |
| Normal Storage | 96 acre-ft |
| Surface Area | 44 acres |
| Drainage Area | 2 sq mi |
| Year Completed | 1965 (61 years old) |
| NID ID | TN06917 |
Safety Information
No probable loss of human life and low economic/environmental losses expected.
Hazard potential describes downstream consequences of failure, not the dam's current condition. What does this mean?
Ownership
WALTER J. HAYBERT
Private
Nearby Dams
Lake Hardeman
Hardeman, TN
Significant HazardLake Vonda
Hardeman, TN
Significant HazardCub Creek #2a
Hardeman, TN
Significant HazardPorters Creek #3
Hardeman, TN
Significant HazardCub Creek #3
Hardeman, TN
Significant HazardCub Creek Tree Farm
Hardeman, TN
Low HazardPorters Creek #4
Hardeman, TN
Low HazardPorters Creek #17
Hardeman, TN
Low HazardFrequently Asked Questions
What is the hazard classification of Cub Creek #1?
Cub Creek #1 is classified as Low Hazard. No probable loss of human life and low economic/environmental losses expected. This classification refers to the potential downstream consequences of a failure, not the dam's current structural condition.
Who owns and operates Cub Creek #1?
Cub Creek #1 is owned by WALTER J. HAYBERT (Private). The owner is responsible for maintenance, inspections, and compliance with dam safety regulations.
When was Cub Creek #1 built?
Cub Creek #1 was completed in 1965, making it 61 years old. Many U.S. dams were built between the 1930s and 1970s during a period of major infrastructure investment.
What is the primary purpose of Cub Creek #1?
Cub Creek #1 serves the following purposes: Flood Risk Reduction. Many dams in the U.S. are multi-purpose, supporting flood control, water supply, recreation, and other uses.
When was Cub Creek #1 last inspected?
Cub Creek #1 was last inspected on January 21, 2021. Inspection dates indicate when a formal review occurred, not the results of that inspection.